- Introduction
The distribution patterns of species diversity refer to the richness and distribution of species in different geographical regions and ecosystems. This distribution pattern is influenced by multiple factors, including climatic conditions, topography, interactions among organisms, and human activities. Generally speaking, species diversity is higher in tropical regions, especially in ecosystems such as tropical rainforests and coral reefs. As latitude increases and altitude rises, species diversity typically decreases. This phenomenon is partly due to the climatic stability and abundant resources in tropical regions that support the survival and reproduction of more species.
Additionally, species diversity is also affected by historical geological events (such as ice ages) and geographical isolation. For example, the species diversity on islands may differ from that on continents because species on islands are isolated from the outside world during their evolutionary process. Understanding the distribution patterns of species diversity is of great significance for ecological conservation and biodiversity management, as it helps identify key ecological areas and assess the impact of environmental changes on species.
- Statement
Species diversity in montane forest communities is negatively correlated with altitude.
- Study Area
Vertical Patterns of Species Diversity in Montane Forest Communities
- Body Paragraph 1
[1] Currently, there is no consensus on the pattern of changes in species diversity of montane forest communities along the altitudinal gradient. Generally, these changes can be summarized into five patterns: species diversity is negatively correlated with altitude, meaning that as altitude increases, the species diversity of plant communities decreases. Many studies have confirmed this pattern. Research on animal communities has also shown that high altitudes and high latitudes share similar ecological environments, specifically that species density is lower in both high-altitude and high-latitude areas. Species diversity is positively correlated with altitude, meaning that as altitude increases, the species diversity of plant communities increases[2]. This situation is relatively rare, and the author believes it may be due to the relatively humid climate of the study area, where species diversity increases with altitude. [3]Studies on the species diversity of montane forest communities in the maritime climate region of Dunedin, New Zealand, have also indicated that species diversity does not change regularly with altitude. However, most studies have pointed out that ecological gradients affect the spatial distribution patterns of species diversity, with the altitudinal gradient playing a decisive role in the pattern of species diversity.
- Body paragraph 2
The community species diversity index is a quantitative value that reflects species diversity, indicating the organizational level, structural type, degree of differentiation, and habitat differences of the community, and has important ecological significance. Many scholars at home and abroad have conducted research on species diversity indices, but there are few reports comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various indices and identifying the applicable range of each index. Chen Tinggui and Zhang Jintun [4] used vegetation data from Guandi Mountain to compare 15 species diversity indices, exploring how to choose an appropriate regional diversity index and how to correctly evaluate the environment. Currently, there are dozens of species diversity index calculation formulas applied in the study of vertical patterns of species diversity in mountain forest communities, some focusing on species richness, some on species evenness, and some on both. This paper mainly summarizes the application of the A diversity index in the vertical pattern of mountain forest communities.
A diversity refers to the abundance of species within a community or habitat, expressed in terms of the quantity derived from the same community sample plot [5]. As an important indicator of community composition and structure, A diversity has always attracted the attention of ecologists. In the study of vertical patterns of mountain forest communities, species richness index, species relative abundance models, species diversity index (in a narrow sense), and species evenness index are mainly used as measurement methods. Among them, the species richness index is expressed by the number of species and is the simplest and oldest method of measuring species diversity. Whenever studying community composition and structure, this index is invariably used; the better indices reflecting community composition structure richness include the Patrick index, Menhinick index, and Margalef index; commonly used species relative abundance models mainly include log-normal distribution, geometric series distribution, log-series distribution, and broken-stick model [6]. Species relative abundance models are more commonly used in animal ecology research and are not often seen in the study of vertical patterns of forest communities.
- Conclusion
Current research on the vertical patterns of species diversity in mountain forest communities mainly focuses on the changes in species diversity along the altitudinal gradient, an ecological factor gradient. In fact, when studying the gradient characteristics of species diversity, it is difficult to completely separate the various ecological factors that comprehensively affect species diversity. These factors include soil nutrients, moisture conditions, light, temperature, stress (toxicity, soil pH, etc.), competition, succession, and disturbances. Additionally, for a large geographical scale, the impact of certain events in geological history should also be considered. Recent studies on species diversity in mountain forest communities and their environmental explanations usually only consider the effects of topography, geomorphology, or temperature and moisture when establishing environmental databases. The credibility of these environmental explanations still needs further exploration. With the continuous improvement of mathematical methods, it is expected that these deficiencies can be partially compensated. Quantitatively separating the various factors affecting the dynamics of species diversity and reasonably and objectively indicating the ecological relationships between plant communities and between vegetation and the environment will make it possible to more comprehensively and deeply interpret the relationship between species diversity and the environment. The exploration of the mechanisms behind the vertical patterns of species diversity in mountain forest communities still needs to be strengthened. Establishing an information system for the vertical patterns of species diversity in mountain forest communities and developing new analytical software may become new directions for development.
7.Recommendations and Refutation
Initial studies on the diversity of A were mostly concentrated on a few limited sample points, which cannot adequately explain the distribution patterns of species along environmental gradients and the detailed trends in diversity changes. The author believes that the research methods still require further exploration.
Currently, the software widely used in the study of vertical patterns of species diversity in mountain forest communities can be divided into two categories: general-purpose software, including Statistica, SAS, SPSS, Genstat, Systat, S-Plus, Minitab, etc.; and multivariate analysis software, including PC-ORD, CANOCO, Cornell, Twinspan, NTSYS-pc, MVSP, etc. Among these, Statistica is rated the highest. Previous studies often used Cornell ecological software or Hill's Twinspan software for two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) of sample plots, the cluster analysis module in Statistica for cluster analysis, and CANOCO software for detrended canonical correspondence analysis (DCCA) of sample plot species information. Currently, DCCA can only be performed using the CANOCO software designed by Braak in 1988. The author believes that general unit analysis and cluster analysis can be conducted using general-purpose software like Statistica, while for multivariate analysis, it is recommended to use specialized ecological multivariate analysis software, such as PC-ORD, CANOCO, etc.
[1] Lomolino, M. V. (2001). Elevation Gradients of Species-Density: Historical and Prospective Views. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 3-13.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x
[2]S Itow Species turnover and diversity patterns along an elevation broad-leaved forest coenocline[J].Journal of Vegetion Science, 1991,2:477~484.
[3] Wilson J B,Sydes M T.Some tests for niche
limitation by examination of species diversity in the Dunedinarea[J],NewZealand.N.Z.J.Bot.,1988,26:237~244.
[4] Chen Tinggui,Zhang Jintui.A comparison of fifteen species diversity indices[J].H enan Science,1999,17:55~57.
[5] Evolution and measurement of species diversity. (n.d.). https://ricottalab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/evolution-and-measurement-of-species-diversity.pdf
[6] Measurement of biotic community diversity I α diversity (part 1). Biodiversity Science. (1994, August 20). https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/10.17520/biods.1994027
